因果问题、逻辑与《论道》的形而上学体系  

Causality,Logic and the Metaphysical System in On Dao

作　　者：刘新文[1] LIU Xinwen(Institute of Philosophy,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院哲学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期34-45,共12页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：中国社会科学院哲学研究所创新工程项目“逻辑与哲学体系建设”资助(2023ZXSCXB02)。

摘　　要：金岳霖在《论道》中建立起自己的形而上学体系。这个体系所运用的方法既有综合也有分析,分析工具主要是现代逻辑方法,这里的现代逻辑主要来自《数学原理》和《符号逻辑概览》。《论道》的形而上学体系的建立,不仅为中国文化中最崇高的概念“道”提出了一个现代形式的形而上学理论,而且为金岳霖自己回答“休谟问题”提供了本体论基础。因此,《论道》不仅强化了中国哲学的逻辑和认识论意识,从而成为宋明理学以来中国哲学发展的高峰,而且具体体现了金岳霖把哲学视为一门普遍的人类学科的态度。Jin Yuelin established his own metaphysical system in his treatise On Dao.The methods used in this system include synthesis and analysis,and the analysis tools are mainly the methods of modern logic.The modern logic here mainly comes from Principia Mathematica and A Survey of Symbolic Logic.The establishment of the metaphysical system in On Dao,not only put forward a modern form of metaphysical theory for Dao,the most lofty concept in Chinese culture,but also provided an ontological basis for Jin Yuelin's answer to“Hume's Problem”.Therefore,The book On Dao not only strengthened the logical and epistemological consciousness of Chinese philosophy,thus becoming the peak of the development of Chinese philosophy since Neo-Confucianism of Song and Ming Dynasties,but also embodied Jin Yuelin's attitude of treating philosophy as a universal human discipline.

关 键 词：《论道》 形而上学 逻辑 因果问题 

分 类 号：B26[哲学宗教—中国哲学]