试论解决道德缺失的两条路径之融合  

A Study on the Convergence of Two Paths to Address Moral Deficiency

作　　者：卢玉 Lu Yu(School of Marxism,Suzhou University of Science and Technology,Suzhou 215009)

机构地区：[1]苏州科技大学马克思主义学院,苏州215009

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第11期148-151,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：道德缺失是当今社会普遍存在的一个问题,而道德心理和道德行为是其表现的两个方面。面对道德缺失问题,传统的伦理学理论给出了不同的解决路径,功利论与义务论虽在此问题的解决上都有着贡献价值,但都存在着明显的局限性。德性论相对于功利论和义务论,提出了不同的解释路径,其“中道”思想、对内在善的追求以及注重德性修养的渐进性特点,能够很好地弥补功利论和义务论在解决道德缺失问题上的不足。由此可见,德性论在这一问题上的优越性是显而易见的,而德性回归也变得尤为重要。Moral deficiency is a widespread problem in today's society,and moral psychology and moral behavior are two aspects of its manifestation.Although both utilitarianism and deontology have contributed to the solution of this problem,both of them have obvious limitations.In contrast to utilitarianism and deontology,virtue theory offers a different path of explanation,and its“middle way”,its pursuit of the intrinsic good and its progressive focus on virtue cultivation can well compensate for the shortcomings of utilitarianism and deontology in solving the problem of moral deficiency.The superiority of virtue theory in this regard is thus clear,and the return of virtue becomes particularly important.

关 键 词：道德缺失 功利论 义务论 德性论 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]