检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:褚华东[1,2] 胡凤培[1] 王宇航 彭宇琪 赵雷[1] CHU Hua-dong;HU Feng-pei;WANG Yu-hang;PENG Yu-qi;ZHAO Lei(School of Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China;Zhijiang College of Zhejiang University of Technology,Shaoxing 312030,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023 [2]浙江工业大学之江学院,绍兴312030
出 处:《应用心理学》2024年第3期203-210,共8页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(31900781);教育部人文社会科学研究基金(19YJC190033,21YJA790010);浙江省自然科学基金(LY22C090006);浙江省社科规划课题成果(21XXJC01ZD)。
摘 要:研究通过两项实验考察了共情对不同道德取向自动驾驶汽车接受意愿的影响。结果发现:(1)低共情者在不涉及自身利益时不在意自动驾驶汽车的道德取向(功利主义/道义论),当涉及自身利益时,更倾向于购买自我保护的汽车。(2)当不涉及自身时,高共情者更倾向于购买功利主义自动驾驶汽车;但也可以接受牺牲自我的汽车,对两类自动驾驶汽车的购买意愿相当。In the present study,two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of empathy on the acceptance of autonomous vehicles with different moral behavioral orientations.The results are as follows:(1)Low empath did not care about the moral orientation of autonomous vehicles(utilitarian/deontology)when self-interest was not involved but was more inclined to purchase self-protective cars when saving more lives mean self-sacrifice.(2)When self-interest was not involved,high empath individuals were more willing to purchase pro-social utilitarian autonomous vehicles,but could also accept autonomous vehicles to save themself,with comparable purchase intentions for pro-social utilitarian and self-protective autonomous vehicles.The results of this study provide some implications for resolving the social acceptance dilemma of autonomous vehicles.
关 键 词:自动驾驶汽车 人工智能 共情 购买意愿 道德判断
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3