检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈永生[1] Chen Yongsheng
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《政法论坛》2024年第4期180-191,共12页Tribune of Political Science and Law
基 金:司法部法治建设与法学理论研究一般项目“法律援助法实施问题与对策研究”(22SFB3019)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:我国2021年颁布的《法律援助法》从多个维度拓展了刑事法律援助的适用范围,但是与域外国家相比,我国刑事法律援助的范围仍然过窄。从制度设置层面而言,这源于以下问题:一是对法律援助的刑罚标准规定过高;二是对法律援助的经济标准要求过严;三是对适用普通程序审理案件法律援助的规定弹性过大;四是对死刑复核案件法律援助的条件规定随意性太强,等等。无论是横向与其他国家相比较,还是纵向考察我国的经济发展及财政收入增长情况,进一步扩大我国刑事法律援助的范围都具有可行性。受立法、经费、人员等客观因素的制约,对刑事法律援助范围的扩大应分近期目标、中期目标与远期目标三个层次依序推进。Legal Aid Law enacted by China in 2021 has expanded the application scope of criminal legal aid from multiple levels.But compared with overseas countries,the application scope of Chinese legal aid is still very limited.From the perspective of the establishment of system,it is caused by the following issues:First,the criminal penalty standards for legal aid are set too high.Second,the economic standards for legal aid are too strict.Third,the rules on legal aid applicable to cases heard through ordinary procedure are too flexible.Fourth,the rules on the condition of legal aid for death penalty review cases are too random,etc.It is feasible for China to further expand the scope of criminal legal aid,whether compared with other countries or judging from Chinese economic development and fiscal revenue growth.Due to the restriction of objective factors like legislation,funds and personnel,the scope of criminal legal aid should be expanded according to short-term goals,medium-term goals and long-term goals in order.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49