检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任莺[1] REN Ying(Lishui university,Lishui 323000,Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]丽水学院,浙江丽水323000
出 处:《当代教师教育》2024年第2期101-108,共8页Contemporary Teacher Education
摘 要:英国研究型大学的教师绩效评价制度表现出鲜明的教师发展性特点,以剑桥、约克和诺丁汉三所研究型大学为例,评价制度中教师发展性的构建集中体现在三个方面:评价围绕教师发展目标的设定和完成展开,有效统一教师和学校发展目标;在评价体系各环节中落实发展性评价原则;采用柔性管理,以谈话或讨论为主要评价形式,建设和谐共赢的绩效文化。这种评价模式对我国高校完善绩效评价制度有借鉴作用:将绩效评价的重心放在“发展”而非“考核”,落实配套的教师帮扶制度,采用柔性管理建设和谐绩效文化。The faculty performance evaluation system in British research universities has distinct faculty development⁃centered characteristics.The faculty performance evaluation systems at Cambridge University,York University,and Nottingham University share common features:evaluation revolves around the setting and completion of teacher development goals,effectively unifying the consistency between individual teacher and school development goals;implementing the developmental faculty evaluation theory into the system;adopting flexible management mode and build up a harmonious and win⁃win evaluation culture.The British faculty performance evaluation model can serve as a positive reference for Chinese universities:it reminds us to place the focus of performance evaluation on“development”rather than“assessment”,implementing supporting teacher assistance systems,and adopting flexible management to build a harmonious performance culture.
分 类 号:G42[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49