公立高校教师服务期协议的实践特征、争议焦点与规制路径  

A Study on Characteristics,Controversial Focus and Regulation Approach of Service Period Agreement Between Public Universities and Teachers

作　　者：王晓芳[1] 陈丽金 吴丹丹 WANG Xiaofang;CHEN Lijin;WU Dandan(Institute of Higher Education Research Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060 China;Guangxi Vocational Normal University,Nanning 530007 China;Shenzhen Jixiang Primary School,Shenzhen 518112 China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学高等教育研究所,广东深圳518060 [2]广西职业师范学院,广西南宁530007 [3]深圳市吉祥小学,广东深圳518112

出　　处：《高等理科教育》2024年第4期27-35,共9页Higher Education of Sciences

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学规划2024年度青年项目“‘双减’背景下义务教育教师工作负担与情感劳动的交互机制研究”(项目编号:GD24YJY03);深圳市教育科学规划2022年度重大招标课题“适应深圳基础教育改革和高质量发展的教师队伍规模、结构、管理路径研究”(项目编号:zdzb22003);深圳市哲学社会科学规划2023年度共建课题“超大型城市基础教育教师队伍规模结构与管理路径优化的深圳样本研究”(项目编号:SZ2023D012)。

摘　　要：服务期协议已成为公立高校对教师流动进行契约化管理的工具。然而,高校与教师围绕服务期协议却频频引发法律争议。服务期协议在实践中表现出形式规范性不足、约定事由繁杂、服务期限无序和违约责任过重等特征。法律适用及其合法性挑战、教师辞职权、违约责任划定构成高校教师服务期的三大争议。构建实体规则以规制高校教师服务期应兼顾民法与劳动法思维、关照聘用合同的特殊性,既保障教师“离开的自由”,也维护高校正当权益。The agreement on service period has become an approach to contractually managing the academic's flow by public universities.However, the service period agreement between universities and teachers has frequently caused legal disputes.The findings showed that the service period agreement is characterized with diverse forms but lack of standardization, complex agreed causes, disordered term, strict resignation and heavy liability for breach.Three controversial focuses were demonstrated, i.e.,the application of law and the challenge of legality, the dispute over teachers' right to resign and the delineation of liability for breach.This study argues that aiming to effectively regulate the service period, the construction of substantive rules should take into account the balance of civil law and labor law, and take care of the particularity of employment contracts, so as to protect the "freedom to leave" of teachers and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of universities.

关 键 词：公立高校教师 服务期 人事争议 辞职权 违约责任 

分 类 号：G645[文化科学—高等教育学]