检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:文玉锋[1] 周亚杰 李通 Wen Yufeng;Zhou Yajie;Li Tong(Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070)
出 处:《职业技术教育》2024年第21期23-28,共6页Vocational and Technical Education
基 金:甘肃省教育厅产业支撑计划项目“基于产教融合的‘大数据会计’专业特色及智慧平台建设研究”(2121CYZC-59),主持人:赵雪梅;甘肃省社科规划项目“渭河流域横向生态补偿政策绩效评估研究”(2021QN009),主持人:杨阳。
摘 要:鉴于中国地域辽阔、经济发展不均衡的国情,识别职业教育在各地表现的差异性对于科学统筹全国职业教育的高质量发展意义重大。利用大语言模型ChatGPT,通过Python程序调用API,对北京市和甘肃省职业院校发布的质量年度报告进行本体关系构建,深入对比分析两地区在人才培养与产教融合方面发展的相似性与差异性。结果显示,北京市凭借其丰富的教育资源,更加注重教师团队、课程设置等关键资源的投入,以增强职业院校的建设水平和创新能力;而甘肃省则更加侧重于学生在校的学习质量保障,就业所需的实际技能,致力于培养适应当地社会经济发展需求的实践性人才。Given China’s vast territory and unbalanced economic development,identifying the differences in the performance of vocational education across regions is of great significance for scientifically coordinating the high-quality development of vocational education nationwide.In this paper,we use the large language model ChatGPT,and invoke its API through the program Python to construct the ontology relationship of the annual quality reports issued by vocational colleges in Beijing and Gansu Province.The similarities and differences between the two regions in personnel training and the industry-education integration are analyzed.The results showed that Beijing,with its abundant educational resources,places more emphasis on the investment in key resources such as teaching teams and curriculum settings to enhance the construction level and innovation capability of vocational colleges.In contrast,Gansu focuses more on ensuring the quality of students’learning and the practical skills needed for employment,aiming to cultivate practical talents that meet the local socio-economic development needs.
关 键 词:大语言模型 职业教育 职业院校 区域发展差异 本体关系 知识图谱
分 类 号:G719.2[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49