检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李月蒙 郭菲[1,2] 陈祉妍 LI Yuemeng;GUO Fei;CHEN Zhiyan(CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;Department of Psychology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院心理健康重点实验室,中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101 [2]中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049
出 处:《教育生物学杂志》2024年第4期304-308,共5页Journal of Bio-education
摘 要:目的探讨技术干扰对亲子阅读质量的影响,以及幼儿性别在其中的调节作用。方法针对12~36月龄幼儿的母亲进行线上匿名问卷调查,包括人口学特征调查问卷、技术干扰量表和家庭环境认知刺激问卷,共获得有效问卷307份。对技术干扰水平、亲子阅读质量及人口学特征信息等数据进行统计学分析。结果相关分析表明,技术干扰水平与亲子阅读质量呈显著负相关。幼儿性别在技术干扰与亲子阅读的关系中起调节作用:对男孩而言,技术干扰显著负向预测亲子阅读质量;此现象在女孩中未显现。结论技术干扰对亲子阅读质量的消极影响受到幼儿性别的调节,男孩更易受影响。Objective To explore the effects of technoference on the quality of parent-child shared-book reading(SBR),and investigate the role of toddlers’gender in it.Methods An online anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted on mothers of toddlers aged 12 to 36 months,including demographic characteristics survey questionnaire,technology device interference scale(TDIS),and StimQ cognitive home environment questionnaire.A total of 307 valid questionnaires were obtained.Then the technoference levels,quality of parent-child SBR,and demographic characteristics were statistically analyzed.Results Correlation analyses showed that there was a significantly negative correlation between the technoference level and the quality of parent-child SBR,and the gender of toddlers played a moderating role between them.For boys,technoference significantly negatively predicted the quality of parent-child SBR,but this phenomenon was not evident in girls.Conclusion The negative impact of technoference on the quality of parent-child SBR is moderated by the gender of toddlers,with boys being more susceptible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145