检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董玉雪 DONG Yuxue(Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
机构地区:[1]清华大学,北京100084
出 处:《中国考试》2024年第9期31-40,共10页journal of China Examinations
摘 要:学生评教自国外引入以来,已逐渐成为高校教学评价中的一项常态化工作。然而,学生评教在实施过程中存在严重的形式化问题,主要表现为制度设计的形式化、活动实施的形式化、评价行动的形式化。问题根源主要在于高等教育高速发展而忽视了教学内在质量标准,外部评价驱动下的学生评教缺乏系统化设计,以及学生评教中的评价关系错位致使主体价值判断缺乏完备性。因此,高校要回归学生评教的实质性逻辑,在教学行动实践中重构教学质量共识,增强学生评教内部体系的系统性以及与其他评教制度的协同性,进一步厘清评价关系,提升学生评教的科学性和实效性。Since its introduction from overseas,student evaluation of teaching has become a standard part of teaching evaluation in universities.However,the implementation process has faced significant issues with formalization,particularly evident in institutional design,activity implementation,and evaluation procedures.The underlying causes include neglect of internal teaching quality standards amidst the rapid development of higher education,lack of systematic design in student evaluation driven by external evaluation,and lack of completeness in subjective value judgments due to misplacement of evaluation relationships.Therefore,universities should refocus on the essential rationale of students'evaluation of teaching.This involves establishing a consensus on teaching quality during teaching practices,enhancing the systematic nature of the internal student evaluation system,and aligning it with other evaluation systems.It is also crucial to clarify the evaluation relationship and enhance the scientific rigor and effectiveness of students'evaluation of teaching.
关 键 词:学生评教 评教形式化 实质性评教 教学质量 评价关系
分 类 号:G405[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.254.237