重论《乐记》的作者及年代问题  

Reassessing the Authorship and the Era of Records of Music

作　　者：杨合林[1,2] 齐小建 Yang Helin;Qi Xiaojian

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学文学院 [2]中国乐学研究中心

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2024年第3期22-39,共18页Chinese Culture Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“先秦乐学文献整理与研究”(17ZDA250)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《乐记》是中国古代乐学的经典著作,探明《乐记》的作者及其时代,事关对此一经典文本阐释的有效性,也关系到中国思想文化史与文学艺术史各学科领域历史谱系的建构与书写。从古至今,对于《乐记》的作者,一直众说纷纭,莫衷一是。其说主要有三,即“公孙尼子说”“刘德说”和“综合说”。全面检视三说的来龙去脉,辨析三说引以为据的各种支撑材料,反思古书作者及年代研究中存在的一些方法与规范问题,可对《乐记》的作者及年代问题得出一相对可靠的结论。Records of Music,known as“Yue Ji”in Chinese,stands as a classic work in the ancient Chinese musicology.Figuring out the authorship and the era of Records of Music is imperative for the effective interpretation of this seminal text and for the formulation and recording of the historical genealogy within various fields of Chinese intellectual and cultural history,as well as the literary and artistic history.Throughout history,there has been a multitude of varying perspectives regarding the authorship of Records of Music,with no consensus reached.The opinion of its authorship can be categorized into three:“opinion of Gongsun Nizi,”“opinion of Liu De,”and“opinion of the synthesized.”A comprehensive review of the origins and development of the three prevailing theories,coupled with a critical analysis of the evidence each presents and a reflection of the methodologies and standards in the research of the authorship and the era of ancient texts,allowing for the formulation of a more credible conclusion about the authorship and the era of Records of Music.

关 键 词：《乐记》 作者 时代 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论] J6[艺术—音乐]