检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢军霞[1] 陈振英[2] Lu Junxia;Chen Zhenying(School of History,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;Library,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310027,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学历史学院,浙江杭州310058 [2]浙江大学图书馆,浙江杭州310027
出 处:《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2024年第8期138-148,共11页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
摘 要:新文科视域下,哲学社会科学的发展应当实现历史传承与时代创新相结合,历史学自主知识体系构建一定程度上推动了哲学社会科学的发展。学术论文是学术研究的重要成果,是高校学科建设的重要表征,是知识体系构建的理论积累,一定程度上反映了学术研究的竞争力。以历史学研究论文为对象,可从研究生产力、影响力、发展力和国际合作力四个维度构建历史学研究竞争力评价模型。对中美10所高校在Scopus数据库中2014年至2023年历史学研究论文进行对比分析,发现中国高校和美国高校在研究竞争力四个维度上各有千秋,中国高校研究生产力规模低于美国高校,但研究影响力及趋势表现优秀;研究发展力美国高校保持较大优势,但中国高校显示出更好的发展潜力;国际合作竞争力中国高校有较大优势,但发展趋势有所下降。这些结论能够为我国高校历史学科建设提供参考。In the context of the new liberal arts,the development of philosophy and social sciences is expected to combine historical inheritance with contemporary innovation,and focus on the construction of independent knowledge systems.This article innovatively proposes an evaluation index system of historical discipline competitiveness from four dimensions:research productivity,research influence,research development power,and international cooperation power,based on the comprehensive exploration of existing evaluation indicators of discipline competitiveness and drawing on internationally recognized indicators,combined with the characteristics of humanities and scientific research achievements.Ten universities in China and the United States from 2014 to 2023 have been selected to analyze their research competitiveness in four dimensions and development trends:publication scale,total citations,subject normalized citation influence,top 10%journal publication and proportion,and number and proportion of international cooperative papers.In terms of productivity research,the publication scale of American universities is significantly higher than that of Chinese universities,but the annual publication quantity of Chinese universities has significantly increased,with a growth rate significantly higher than that of American universities.In terms of research influence dimension,American universities and Chinese universities each have their own advantages in performance.American universities perform better than Chinese universities in terms of total citation frequency and the top 10%of high citations,but Chinese universities perform better than American universities in terms of the 10%proportion of high citations in the top 10%.The FWCI values of 10 universities in China and the United States are all higher than the global average,and there is not much difference between Chinese and American universities.The trend of research influence in Chinese universities has shown excellent performance,with the number of highly cited TOP10%pa
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] K0-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147