检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范跃芬[1] FAN Yuefen(School of Foreign Studies,Lanzhou Jiaotong University,Lanzhou 730070,China)
出 处:《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第5期96-104,共9页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“马克思德文原著与欧洲文学视域融合的研究”(22BWW001)。
摘 要:在文学研究中,批评家们阐释马克思著作和莎士比亚作品互文的工作已经进行了150多年。而马克思在《资本论》中大量引用莎士比亚经典的现象,仍然是一个被持续探讨的议题。通过悖论以及反转两个维度对《资本论》和莎士比亚戏剧进行哲学诠释重构,读者得以窥见莎士比亚经典所蕴藏的时代精神内涵之于马克思政治经济学批判的启示。马克思对莎士比亚的研习化用绝不只是出于丰富表达、美化文风的单纯修辞学考虑,更重要的是,《资本论》与莎士比亚的视域融合内在地促进了马克思的思想发展与理论建构,使文学彰显出来的真理性拓展到经济哲学的维度。In literary studies,critics have been interpreting the intertextuality between Marx’s works and Shakespeare’s writings for over 150 years.However,the question of why Marx quoted so extensively from Shakespeare’s classics in Capital remains a continually evolving and frequently re-examined issue.By reconstructing the philosophical interpretation of Capital and Shakespearean drama through the dimensions of paradox and reversal,readers can gain insights into how the spirit of the times embedded in Shakespeare’s works inspired Marx’s critique of political economy.Marx’s engagement with Shakespeare was not merely a rhetorical device to enrich his expression or embellish his prose.More importantly,the fusion of perspectives between Capital and Shakespeare facilitated the development of Marx’s thought and theoretical framework,bringing the truth revealed in literature into the realm of economic philosophy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.20.233.121