AIGC支持下“双师课堂”协作学习范式构建及应用  

Construction and Application of Collaborative Learning Paradigm in“Dual-Teacher Classroom”Supported by AIGC

作　　者：吴军其[1] 张萌萌[1] 吴飞燕[1] 龚蕾[1] 徐慧[1] WU Junqi;ZHANG Mengmeng;WU Feiyan;GONG Lei;XU Hui

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学人工智能教育学部,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《现代远程教育研究》2024年第6期93-101,111,共10页Modern Distance Education Research

基　　金：2024年度湖北省教育科学规划一般课题“人工智能技术赋能高校教师教学能力提升机理及路径研究”(2024GB391);华中师范大学2024年教师教育名师工作室主持人暨重点项目培育研究项目“智能时代中学信息科技教师核心素养测评与提升策略研究”(CCNUMS2024-01)。

摘　　要：生成式人工智能(AIGC)具有强大的内容理解、逻辑推理和语境对话能力,有助于解决学习者协作学习中长期存在的观点论据不足、交互缺乏深度、知识建构浅层化和学习投入度不高等问题。在“双师”赋能教与学的课堂新形态下,助力协作学习问题解决是“双师”协同的逻辑起点,赋能协作学习全过程是“双师”协同的逻辑路线,提高协作学习效率和效果是“双师”协同的逻辑终点。在此思路下构建的“双师课堂”协作学习范式,将“双师课堂”理念贯穿于协作学习的准备阶段、协作阶段和总结阶段,持续提供动态化内容生成、个性化学习支持、即时性评价反馈等功能,实现了“双师课堂”在教学辅导、反馈答疑、监督评价等方面的人机协同。将其应用于教学实践的实验结果表明:AIGC支持下“双师课堂”协作学习范式有助于促进学生知识掌握、提升学生协作学习投入度和批判性思维能力,从而提高协作学习效率和效果。未来,“双师课堂”协作学习范式的应用需坚持以育人为本、遵循教学规律、注重教师引领的基本原则,达成“人师”与“机师”的取长补短和互学共长。Generative Artificial Intelligence boasts robust capabilities in content understanding,logical reasoning and contextual dialogue,which can help address persistent issues in collaborative learning among comprehensive assessment of reasoning,argumentation and information credibility in real-world contexts.The application of ChatGPT in critical thinking assessment helps enrich the evaluation content,innovate the interaction modes,and enhance the efficiency and accuracy of assessment,providing new perspectives and methods for multi-dimensional critical thinking evaluation.Based on the critical thinking assessment framework and a five-dimensional assessment rubric,a ChatGPT-based online platform is used to assess the critical thinking levels reflected in 186 argumentative essays from 31 university students.The findings reveal that ChatGPT,as a writing aid,significantly improve students’argumentative writing abilities in three themes of writing,which are“weighing the pros and cons”,“graphics-based contexts”and“opposing viewpoints”.Moreover,the critical thinking assessment conducted with ChatGPT demonstrates a high degree of precision,with subtle differences in assessments across different thematic tasks.This result indicates that ChatGPT is highly efficient in capturing and evaluating direct and explicit elements of critical thinking but still has limitations in assessing logical reasoning and the depth of argument.In the future,the design of prompt words should be further optimized to guide ChatGPT to deep understand the critical thinking levels demonstrated in human-machine dialogues,enhancing its adaptability and accuracy in handling complex cognitive tasks,thereby achieving personalized critical thinking evaluation and cultivation.

关 键 词：AIGC 双师课堂 协作学习 范式构建 

分 类 号：G434[文化科学—教育学]