论胡塞尔与笛卡尔关于哲学方法的可能对话及其意义  

On the Possible Dialogue between Husserl and Descartes on Philosophical Methods and Its Significance

作　　者：刘唯嘉 LIU Weijia(School of Philosophy and Sociology,Hebei University,Baoding,Hebei 071002,China)

机构地区：[1]河北大学哲学与社会学学院,河北保定071002

出　　处：《保定学院学报》2024年第6期30-35,共6页Journal of Baoding University

摘　　要：胡塞尔的笛卡尔阐释只看到了笛卡尔对假象的思考,而笛卡尔的普遍怀疑则涉及假象、梦境和恶神三重方法。所以,笛卡尔在方法论上有能力回应胡塞尔,以澄清学界借由胡塞尔的阐释对他所形成的误解。胡塞尔虽在很大程度上错失了笛卡尔的方法,但他仍能通过一种“毁灭世界”的思想实验来达到彻底的悬置。可见,胡塞尔和笛卡尔在思想上可以展开一场开放多元的对话。这种“可能对话”的研究思路,有助于将研究目光引导向哲学史上的经典原著,以避免一家之言,从而真正“回到事情本身”。Husserl's Descartes interpretation only sees Descartes"contemplation of delusions.Descartes'general skepticism involves the triple method of delusions,dreams,and evil genius.So,Descartes has the ability to respond to Husserl's methodology in order to clarify the misunderstandings that the academic community has formed about him through Husserl's interpretation.But interestingly,although Husserl largely missed out on Descartes'method,he was still able to achieve complete suspension through a thought experiment of"Annihilation of the World".It can be seen that Husserl and Descartes can engage in an open and diverse dialogue in their thinking.The significance of this"possible dialogue"research approach is to guide the research focus towards classic works in the history of philosophy,in order to avoid one-sided opinions and truly"back to the thing-in-itself".

关 键 词：胡塞尔 笛卡尔 哲学方法 普遍怀疑 

分 类 号：B516.52[哲学宗教—外国哲学]