子路之勇再探——基于孔孟荀勇德思想的视角  

A Re-Examination of Zi Lu’s Courage Based on the Perspective of Confucius,Mencius and XunZi’s Thoughts of Courage

作　　者：冯前林[1] 赵宇 FENG Qian-lin;ZHAO Yu(School of Philosophy,Shanxi University,Taiyuan Shanxi 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大学哲学学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《晋中学院学报》2024年第6期32-37,共6页Journal of Jinzhong University

基　　金：山西省哲学社会科学规划课题“傅山子学思想及其时代价值研究”(2021YJ069)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：子路好勇的个性是儒家一直以来的共识,《孔子家语·七十二弟子解》评价其“为人果烈而刚直”。这位热衷于“问强”的孔门弟子最终死于卫国内乱,惨遭醢刑,然素喜品评人物的孔子却未对弟子的舍生取义之举做出评价。孔孟荀视野中的勇德须居于仁、合于礼、据于知,而子路之勇在仁、礼、知的层面皆“登堂而未入室”,这也使得他无法成为儒家尽善尽美的勇德典范。尽管如此,子路之勇也不失其有所取材之处。Zi Lu’s courageous personality has long been the consensus of Confucianism.“The seventy-two Disciples of Confucius”in The Family Saying of Confucius(Kongzi Jiayu)evaluates him as“resolute and straight”.This disciple of Confucius,who was keen on“asking strong”eventually died in the civil unrest in Wei,and was brutally executed.However,Confucius,who was fond of evaluating characters,did not comment on his disciple’s act of“sacrificing his life for justice”.In the vision of Confucius,Mencius and Xun,courage must be based on benevolence,conform to propriety,and learn from wisdom,while Zi Lu’s courage is obviously“in the hall,but not yet in the room”in the levels of benevolence,propriety,and wisdom,which makes him unable to become a perfect Confucian model of courageous virtues.Nonetheless,Zi Lu’s courage does not lose its draw.

关 键 词：子路 勇德 仁 礼 知 

分 类 号：B222.3[哲学宗教—中国哲学]