检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋佳[1,2] 王芮 朱莹 SONG Jia;WANG Rui;ZHU Ying
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学国际与比较教育研究院/联合国教科文组织教师教育中心 [2]上海师范大学教育部“教育大数据与教育决策实验室”,上海200234 [3]华南师范大学国际与比较教育研究所,广东广州510631 [4]上海师范大学教育学院党委,上海200234
出 处:《中国教育学刊》2025年第1期29-36,共8页Journal of The Chinese Society of Education
基 金:2024年度全国教育科学规划国家青年课题“世界主要国家高等教育制度型开放战略研究”(项目编号:CDA240262)研究成果。
摘 要:新公共管理对全球教育领域产生了深远影响,问责主义成为全球主要国家中小学教师绩效评价体系的设计与实施逻辑,教师绩效评价作为一种表现报告、技术过程与制度化进程,对教师、学生以及学校系统发挥质量管理功能。根据不同国家的教师绩效评价主体、内容与方式,教师绩效评价模式可分为官僚问责、专业问责、市场问责与管理问责四种模式,管理问责逐步成为全球教师绩效评价的主流模式。当前,教师绩效评价的效用仍存在限度,联合国教科文组织《全球教师报告》倡议面向未来,教师绩效评价应发挥多主体作用,服务教师发展性,并合理审慎运用绩效评价结果。为此,不少国家通过完善指标体系、提升评价主体专业化水平以及改进评价技术,促使教师绩效评价逐步向善。The New Public Management has exerted a profound impact on the global education field,positioning accountability as the guiding principle for designing and implementing primary and secondary school teachers' performance evaluation systems in major countries worldwide.Teacher performance evaluation functions as a quality management tool for teachers,students and the school system,encompassing performance reporting,technical processes and institutionalization.According to the subject,content and method of teacher performance evaluation in different countries,the teacher performance evaluation model can be divided into four modes:bureaucratic accountability,professional accountability,market accountability and managerial accountability,with managerial accountability gradually becoming the dominant mode of global teacher performance evaluation.Currently,there are still limits to the effectiveness of teacher performance evaluation.UNESCO's Global Report on Teachers advocates that,for the future,teacher performance evaluation should play a multi-subject role,serve the developmental nature of teachers,and use the results of performance evaluation in a reasonable and prudent manner.In response,many countries have promoted the teacher performance evaluation for good by refining the indicator system,upgrading the professionalism of evaluation subjects and improving evaluation techniques.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.201