伙伴教育在学术型医学博士研究生实验教学中的初探  

A preliminary study of peer education in experimental teaching for academic medical doctoral students

作　　者：江倩[1] 侯池 黄畅 陈豫钦[1] Jiang Qian;Hou Chi;Huang Chang;Chen Yuqin(Department of Pulmonary and Critial Care Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510120,China;Department of Neurology,Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510623,China)

机构地区：[1]广州医科大学附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,广东广州510120 [2]广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心神经内科,广东广州510623

出　　处：《中华临床实验室管理电子杂志》2024年第4期251-255,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition)

基　　金：广州市科技计划基础与应用基础研究项目(202201020538,202102020019);广州医科大学大学生实验室开放项目(广医大[2020]50号);广州医科大学科研能力提升计划;呼吸疾病全国重点实验室自主课题(SKLRD-Z-202513)。

摘　　要：目的探索伙伴教育在学术型医学博士研究生实验教学中的作用,评估其教学效果,为学术型医学博士实验教学改革探讨思路。方法去纳入广州医科大学附属第一医院2019一2020级111名博士研究生,随机分为传统实验教学组(传统教学组)55名和“小班教学+伙伴教育”实验教学组(伙伴教育组)56名,通过问卷形式调查其对课程的满意度、实验技术熟悉度及后续课题开展情况,评价其应用效果。结果伙伴教育组和传统教学组学员的性别、年龄比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。伙伴教育组对教学满意度高于传统教学组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=111,P=0.0086)。与传统教学组相比,伙伴教育组学员认为通过伙伴教育模式后,都能掌握后期课题研究所需的实验技术,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=8.6,P=0.0001)。此外伙伴教育组学员比传统教育组学员能更早地开展研究课题,两者比较差异有统计学意义(t=6.6,P=0.0001)。结论伙伴教育在学术型医学博士研究生实验教学中具有较好的可行性及教学效果,具有推广应用价值。Objective To explore the application of peer education in the experimental teaching of academic medical doctoral students,evaluate its teaching effectiveness,and discuss ideas for reforming the academic-oriented medical doctoral experimental education.Methods A total of 1ll doctoral students in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into the traditional experimental teaching group of 55 students and the peer education group of 56 students.The satisfaction with the course,the familiarity and performance of follow-up experimental technology were investigated and evaluated by questionnaire.ResultsThere was no significant difference in gender and age between the traditional experimental teaching group and peer education group(P>0.05).The results showed that the satisfaction of the peer education group was significantly higher than that of the traditional teaching group,and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=111,P=0.0086).Compared to the traditional teaching group,students in the peereducation group believed that they could master the follow-up experimental technology needed for later research through the peer education pattern,the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=8.6,P=0.0001).In addition,research projects were completed significantly earlier in the peer education group than those in the traditional education group(t=6.6,P-0.0001).Conclusion Applying peer education was effective in the experimental study of academic medical doctoral students and has promotion and application value.

关 键 词：伙伴教育 医学博士研究生 实验教学 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]