论汉唐之际的假借学说  

A Brief Introduction to the Study of Jia Jie During the Han and Tang Dynasties

作　　者：王耀国 WANG Yao-guo(School of Liberal Arts,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710119,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学文学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第2期17-21,共5页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目:六书学通史研究(19AZD040);国家社科基金冷门绝学研究专项学术团队项目:古代六书学文献整理与研究暨数据库建设(23VJXT004)。

摘　　要：西汉之际,假借学说虽未产生,但以毛亨为代表的一些学者在传注经典时对某些字的训释已经蕴藏着对“本有其字”之假借现象的揭示。及至东汉,许慎和郑玄分别对“本无其字”之假借及“本有其字”之假借作明确阐释,标志着假借学说正式确立。西晋至唐,虽未有专事《说文》、六书研究的著作问世,但以西晋卫恒的《四体书势》、唐贾公彦的《周礼义疏》、唐慧琳的《一切经音义》为代表的著述或多或少地涉及对假借内涵的揭示以及以“假借”释字的实践。从中可知,这一时期的学者们对假借的内涵、性质等问题均有了进一步思考,这为五代至明假借研究的进一步深入奠定了良好的基础。During the Western Han Dynasty,although the theory of Jia Jie had not yet emerged,some scholars represented by Mao Heng had already revealed the phenomenon of Jia Jie from certain characters when interpreting classics.In the Eastern Han Dynasty,Xu Shen and Zheng Xuan respectively provided clear explanations on the Jia Jie of“originally without its own characters”and“originally with its own characters”,marking the formal establishment of the theory of Jia Jie.From the Western Jin Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty,although there were no specialized works on“Shuowen”or the study of the Liu shu,works such as Wei Heng’s“Four Style Book Trends”from the Western Jin Dynasty,Jia Gongyan’s“Zhou Li Yi Shu”from the Tang Dynasty,and Tang Huilin’s“All Classics Yin Yi”more or less involved the revelation of the connotation of Jia jie and the practice of interpreting characters through“Jia Jie”.It can be seen from this that scholars during this period further pondered on the connotation,nature,and other issues of Jia Jie,which laid a good foundation for further in-depth research on Jia Jie from the Five Dynasties to the Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：假借 六书 汉唐 文字 

分 类 号：H122[语言文字—汉语]