思政背景下重症医学专业教学实践探讨  

Discussion on the teaching practice of integrating ideological and political education into critical care medicine

作　　者：黄立[1] 吴朝 蔡君婷 艾宇航[1] 徐道妙[1] 刘志勇[1] 张丽娜[1] Huang Li;Wu Zhao;Cai Junting;Ai Yuhang;Xu Daomiao;Liu Zhiyong;Zhang Lina(Department of Intensive Care Unit,Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410000,China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学湘雅医院重症医学科,长沙410000

出　　处：《中华重症医学电子杂志》2024年第4期375-378,共4页Chinese Journal Of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition)

基　　金：湖南省普通高等学校教学改革研究项目(HNJG-20230073);中南大学“课程思政”建设项目(2022YJSKS001);中南大学教育教学改革项目(2023JY071,2023JY071-2)

摘　　要：目的探讨重症医学专业教学中融入思政课程的案例式教学方法的效果。方法于2020年至2021年期间在我院ICU实习的中南大学湘雅医学院2016级临床、麻醉专业本科生作为研究对象,采用简单随机分组法将其分为实验组(91人)和对照组(89人),其中实验组采用案例式教学法进行重症专业及思政课程融合教学,对照组采用分别开设重症专业课程及思政课程教学。教学结束后,通过问卷调查获取学生认可率评价。结果通过调查,与对照组比较,实验组认为新课程设计更合理(85.71%vs 68.54%,P=0.0075),对新课程设计更满意(81.32%vs 67.42%,P=0.0403);更贴合实际(78.02%vs 62.92%,P=0.0334),更能提升学习兴趣(72.53%vs 53.93%,P=0.0334),更能提升专业能力(76.92%vs 55.06%,P=0.0027),更能提高团队合作能力(93.41%vs 80.90%,P=0.0140),以及更早融入临床(83.52%vs 69.66%,P=0.0345);更具有教学优势(86.81%vs 69.66%,P=0.0065),更能提升学生爱国主义教育(92.31%vs 79.78%,P=0.0178),以及更能提升执业素养(90.11%vs 78.65%,P=0.0404),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论案例式教学法将思政融入重症医学专业教学对提升学生的专业能力以及加强爱国主义教育、团队合作精神、不抛弃不放弃救治精神等职业素养具有显著优势。Objective To explore the effect of the teaching method integrating ideological and political curriculum in critical care medicine.Methods The undergraduate students of grade 2016 from Xiangya Medical College,Central South University in semester 2020-2021 were in the recruited research.These students were randomly divided into experimental group and control group.The experimental group(91 students)adopted the case teaching method of critical care medicine integrating ideological and political curriculum,while the control group(89 students)adopted the teaching method of teaching critical care medicine and ideological and political curriculum separately.At the end of teaching,the student recognition rate was obtained through questionnaire survey.Results Compared with the students in the control group,the students in the experimental group thought that the new curriculum design was more reasonable(85.71%vs 68.54%,P=0.0075)and were more satisfactory(81.32%vs 67.42%,P=0.0403).The students in the experimental group believed that the case teaching method of professional courses integrating ideological and political curriculum was more realistic(78.02%vs 62.92%,P=0.0334),and could better enhance learning interests(72.53%vs 53.93%,P=0.0334),professional abilities(76.92%vs 55.06%,P=0.0027),teamwork ability(93.41%vs 80.90%,P=0.0140),earlier integration(83.52%vs 69.66%,P=0.0345);more teaching advantage(86.81%vs 69.66%,P=0.0065),students’patriotism education(92.31%vs 79.78%,P=0.0178),and professional literacy(90.11%vs 78.65%,P=0.0404).The differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The case teaching method of critical care medicine integrating ideological and political curriculum has significant advantages in enhancing students’professional abilities and strengthening patriotism education,teamwork spirits,and the spirits of not giving up.

关 键 词：重症医学 思政课程 案例式教学法 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]