澳大利亚Haese版IBDP和中国人教A版高中数学教材中数学史的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of the History of Mathematics in Australian Haese IBDP and Chinese PEP A Version of High School Mathematics Textbooks

作　　者：李立斌[1] 王洁 朱家生[1] LI Li-bin;WANG Jie;ZHU Jia-sheng(College of Mathematical Science,Yangzhou University,Jiangsu Yangzhou 225009,China)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学数学科学学院,江苏扬州225009

出　　处：《数学教育学报》2025年第1期13-19,共7页Journal of Mathematics Education

基　　金：江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划课题——文化共融视角下社交媒体对少数民族中学生数学学习的促进及机制研究(C/2022/01/72)。

摘　　要：对澳大利亚Haese版IBDP和中国人教A版高中数学教材中的数学史进行对比研究,比较二者在数量、栏目分布、内容类别、知识领域、运用方式、信息载体、多元文化等方面的异同.对融入数学史的高中数学教材提出如下建议:增加数学史数量,隐性呈现数学史;强化数学思想方法,挖掘几何数学史;呈现文明古国数学成就,促进多元文化均衡;保证图文数学史质量,丰富信息载体形式;融入正文与例习题,顺应式呈现数学史.A comparative study of mathematics history between Australian Haese IBDP version and Chinese PEP A version of high school mathematics textbooks conducted to analyze the similarities and differences in the aspects of number,column distribution,content classification,knowledge domain distribution,application,information carrier and multiculturalism.The following suggestions are put forward for high school mathematics textbooks integrating the history of mathematics:increase the number of mathematics history and present the history of mathematics implicitly;strengthen the mathematical thinking method and excavate the history of geometric mathematics;present the mathematical achievements of ancient civilizations and promote multicultural balance;ensure the quality of the history of graphic mathematics and enrich the form of information carrier;and incorporate mathematics history into the text and exercises and present the history of mathematics adeptly.

关 键 词：数学史 数学教材 比较研究 

分 类 号：G420[文化科学—课程与教学论]