绩效问责制导向下高校教师评价的指标陷阱及治理策略  

Flawed Metrics and Governance Strategies of Teacher Evaluation in Colleges and Universities Under the Performance Accountability System

作　　者：张继河[1] 周文文 ZHANG Ji-he;ZHOU Wen-wen(Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China)

机构地区：[1]江西农业大学,江西南昌330045

出　　处：《黑龙江高教研究》2025年第4期68-75,共8页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education

基　　金：江西省社会科学基金项目“新文科视域下高校文科教师专业发展的现实困境与实践路径研究--基于高校调研数据”(编号:23JY07);江西省学位与研究生教育教学改革研究重点项目“‘新文科’建设视域下高校学术型硕士生导师专业发展路径优化的研究与实践”(编号:JXYJG-2022-065);江西省高等学校教学改革重点研究课题“‘新文科’建设视角下高校专任教师专业发展路径优化的研究与实践--以江西A大学为例”(编号:JXJG-22-3-1)。

摘　　要：高校教师是培养创新人才的内生动力,优化高校教师评价是落实新时代教育评价改革的必然之举。当前高校存在两种典型的教师评价方式:一种是以结果为取向的绩效评价或业绩考核评价;另一种是以促进教师专业发展为取向的发展性评价。在绩效问责制导向下,高校倾向以结果为取向来评价教师工作表现,容易忽视教师专业成长,过度迷恋量化指标,形成“指标固恋”怪圈,从而落入投机“作弊”、目标排挤和文化破坏等指标陷阱。对此,要通过优化顶层设计、完善监督机制、实施多元评价、加强合作文化建设等措施实现突围。College and university teachers are the endogenous driving force for cultivating innovative talents,andoptimizing the evaluation of college and university teachers is an inevitable step to implement the educational evaluation reform in the new era.Currently,there are two typical methods of teacher evaluation in colleges and universities:one is the performance evaluation or performance appraisal evaluation oriented to results;the other is the developmental evaluation oriented to promote teachers'professional development.Guided by the performance accountability system,colleges and universities tend to evaluate their teachers'work performance with the orientation of results,which is prone to neglect teachers'professional development,overly obsessedwith quantitative indicators,forming a strange loop of"metric fixation",and thereby fling into the tyranny of metrics such as opportunistic cheating,target exclusion,cultural destruction and so on.In this regard,breakthroughs can be achieved through measures like optimizing the top-level design,perfecting the supervision mechanism,implementing multiple evaluations,strengthening the construction of a cooperative culture and so on.

关 键 词：绩效问责 高校教师 教师评价 指标陷阱 

分 类 号：G645.11[文化科学—高等教育学]