萧楚《春秋辨疑》的宋学旨趣  

The Song School Orientation of Xiao Chu's Chunqiu Bianyi

作　　者：朱汉民[1] 鲁晓聪 ZHU Hanmin;LU Xiaocong

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院,长沙410000

出　　处：《孔子研究》2025年第2期83-91,159,共10页Confucius Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“宋学源流”(项目编号:19ZDA028)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：萧楚对《春秋》的基本看法和他的政治主张在《春秋辨疑》中得到集中体现。萧楚通过分析“史”的特点以及批驳杜预,明确了《春秋》“经”的属性。同时,萧楚在解经时并非逐条疏解,而是采取按例分类的模式,不但兼采“三传”,而且广泛述及他家对同一问题的看法,持论较为公允。在对《春秋》经义推阐时,萧楚尤为重视尊王大义,并从“术”的层面强烈要求王者掌握威福二柄,从而维护王权。从《春秋》学的发展脉络来看,萧楚的《春秋辨疑》无论是其解经模式,还是强烈“尚术”的政治主张,皆有其自身特点,并呈现出较为明显的《春秋》宋学的学术旨趣,在两宋《春秋》学史上应有一席之地。Xiao Chu's basic views on the Spring and Autumn Annals and his political propositions are concentratedly reflected in Chunqiu Bianyi(春秋辨疑).Xiao Chu clarified the“classic”attributes of the Spring and Autumn Annals by analyzing the characteristics of“history”and refuting Du Yu.At the same time,Xiao Chu did not explain the classics line-by-line,but adopted a categorical approach.He not only adopted the Three Commentaries(三传)but also widely discussed other scholars'views on the same issues,thereby maintaining a relatively fair argument.When expounding on the essence of the Spring and Autumn Annals,Xiao Chu attached great importance to respecting the king's righteousness,and strongly required the king to master the two handles of punishment and reward from the level of“strategic governance”to maintain the king's power.From the perspective of the development of the studies of Spring and Autumn Annals,both the interpretative model and the pronounced political advocacy of“strategic governance”in Xiao Chu's Chunqiu Bianyi possess their unique characteristics and it shows a relatively obvious academic interest of the studies of Spring and Autumn Annals in Song Dynasty.As such,it deserves a distinctive place in the history of the studies of Spring and Autumn Annals during the Song Dynasty.

关 键 词：萧楚 《春秋辨疑》 经史观 尊王 威福 

分 类 号：B244[哲学宗教—中国哲学]