检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁芷彤 杜雁[1] 夏海燕[1] LIANG Zhitong;DU Yan;XIA Haiyan(College of Horticulture&Forestry Sciences,Huazhong Agricultural University;UniversitéParis Sciences et Lettres(EPHE-PSL))
机构地区:[1]华中农业大学园艺林学学院 [2]巴黎文理研究大学-法国高等研究应用学院
出 处:《风景园林》2025年第5期125-132,共8页Landscape Architecture
基 金:襄阳园冶集团创新基金。
摘 要:【目的】以价值整体认知为基础进行历史文化遗产保护利用已成共识,建立区别于单体特征提炼、突出整体特性的认知模式,探究部分是否以及如何在整体特性中发挥作用,为历史文化遗产资源的梳理与整合探索创新路径。【方法】通过文献归纳与演绎,总结文化景观式方法的主要步骤与核心内容,提炼场域理论的内涵与应用逻辑,剖析文化景观场域的内涵与空间实践过程,梳理其中的行动者并凝练出场域本体模型,完成文化景观场域的认知与建构。【结果】基于文化凝聚力的场效应与作用机制,揭示场域关联表征,提取文化景观场域组织结构与运行机理的形式化描述思路,最终建立具有可操作性的文化景观场域阐释框架。【结论】补充以关联性为首要考量因素的识别与整合方式,串联从关系论出发的文化景观分析逻辑与基于实体论的空间处理实践,推动历史文化遗产资源的整体性保护理念向可操作的空间规划管理方案转化。[Objective]The integrity-based paradigm in cultural heritage conservation and utilization has achieved disciplinary consensus within the professional domain,where systematic documentation of historical−cultural heritage resources(HCHR)constitutes the foundation for resource integration and subsequent spatial specific planning.However,current research is still in its infancy and faces dual challenges:ambiguous criteria for integrity definition and insufficient methodologies for revealing intra-systemic relationships.While cultural landscape approaches have gained international traction,their application predominantly focuses on protected areas,rarely addressing critical aspects of integrity assessment,resource selection,or boundary delineation,for which a relational network has yet to be established in the sense of a system.Aiming to explore a viable path for the collation and integration of HCHR,this research proposes an innovative framework that shifts from single-entity feature extraction to systemic integrity characterization,investigating how constituent elements functionally interact within integral configurations.[Methods]Through inductive−deductive analysis of literature and case studies,the research first deconstructs the operational logic of cultural landscape approach.Subsequently,field theory is introduced to establish a cultural landscape field(CLF)conceptual model via interdisciplinary theoretical synthesis,involving:1)Systematic review;2)ontological modeling of CLF;3)development of an association-based indicator system integrating resource networks,value hierarchies,and historical contexts.[Results]This research establishes three pivotal advancements through systematic inquiry.First,critical examination of existing cultural landscape methodologies identifies two fundamental means addressing definitional ambiguities and interpretive enhancement in HCHR research:integrity value evaluation and historical−thematic information correlation.These means respectively resolve the criteria formulation fo
关 键 词:文化景观 历史文化遗产 整体性 场域 解释框架 方法论
分 类 号:TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13