检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱绍姬[1]
出 处:《牡丹江教育学院学报》2017年第Z1期43-46,共4页Journal of Mudanjiang College of Education
基 金:福建省教育科学"十二五"规划2015年课题"大学英语课堂学习共同体构建研究"(FJJKCG15-122)研究成果
摘 要:以非英语专业二年级学生为实验对象,通过写作测试、写作文本、课堂观察和学生访谈等研究工具,对比四人组与六人组在同伴互评反馈信息和对英语四级写作影响的异同。其共同点是学生提出和采纳的纠错性反馈都集中微观层面,互评后学生篇章内容能力的提高促进写作成绩提升。不同点是四人组语法词汇的纠错性反馈数量不如六人组多,但其采用率更高,而且实验后四人组篇章内容成绩和写作总分高于六人组,其诱因是认知负荷和情感过滤的不同。This experimental study aims at exploring the similarities and differences that group size brings to peer feedback.The subjects are 99non-English majors and the research instruments are writing tests,students' writing drafts,classroom observations and interviews.The results indicate that both four-member groups and six-member groups focus their feedback on grammar and vocabulary and the improvement of their writing grades mainly stems from their raised ability in content and text structure arrangement.The differences between the two groups are that although the former group can provide more feedback in grammar and vocabulary,their feedback adoption rates are lower.Moreover,after the experiment,four-member groups make more progress in writing than the other group.The main reason lies in their different amount of cognitive load and affective filter.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49