检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张光全[1]
出 处:《史学月刊》2003年第6期95-100,共6页Journal of Historical Science
摘 要:司马迁、班固史学思想的差异是多方面的 ,究其根由 ,除了他们的个人经历、识见不尽相同外 ,关键还在于两人所处的历史环境不同 ,而由此促成的两人游侠思想的差异即是很好的例证。随着汉政府对游侠打击的力度不断加大 ,两汉社会群体的价值取向经历着从崇侠到抑侠的心理转变 ,马、班承此影响 ,在《史记》、《汉书》中虽然同为游侠立传 ,但目的迥异 ,他们对游侠的好恶及对游侠范围的界定亦存有差异 ,以至形成了两人不同的游侠观。Sima Qian differed from Ban Gu in many aspects of historical ideology.Among various reasons, apart from their respective experience and knowledge,the different historical environment they lived in cannot be overemphasized,and it resulted in different attitudes of Sima Qian and Ban Gu towards chivalries.This paper points out that,as the Han governments devoted increasing efforts to attacking the chivalries,the social groups' values of the Han Dynasty underwent great conversions from admiring the chivalries to belittling them.Sima Qian and Ban Gu were inevitably affected by these reasons.Although there were biographies of chivalries in The Records of the Historian and The Book of Han Dynasty, they served different purposes.Sima Qian and Ban Gu expressed different opinions towards chivalries and defined them from different aspects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117