检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]胡志明市财经大学国际语言与文化系,越南 胡志明市 [2]北京语言大学汉语学院,北京
出 处:《现代语言学》2023年第4期1567-1576,共10页Modern Linguistics
摘 要:本文采用对比分析法,对现代汉语动词“去”与其对应越语动词“đi”各自在句法功能和语义特征上的特点进行了考察。通过研究发现,两者均指人或动物的动作行为,可以是所在的地方到别的地方,也可以放在别的动词表示即将要做某件事情。此外,两者之间也存在着诸多不同,具体是越语动词“đi”有将近十三个义项是特有的,而现代汉语动词“去”只有七个。通过对比后本文还给越南本土汉语教师提供一些有用的教学技巧。This paper uses the method of comparative analysis to investigate the characteristics of the syn-tactic function and semantic features of the modern Chinese verb “qu” and its corresponding Vi-etnamese verb “đi”. Through research, it is found that both refer to the actions and behaviors of people or animals, which can be from the place where they are to other places, or can be placed in other verbs to express that they are about to do something. In addition, there are many differences between the two. Specifically, the Vietnamese verb “đi” has nearly 13 unique meanings, while the modern Chinese verb “qu” has only seven. After comparison, this article also provides some useful teaching skills for local Chinese teachers in Vietnam.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30