检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄浩杰
出 处:《理论数学》2025年第1期267-273,共7页Pure Mathematics
摘 要:随着模式识别、机器学习、遥感技术等相关学科领域的发展,高光谱遥感影像分类研究取得了快速进展。高光谱影像具有高维度和高相关性,导致“维度灾难”。而高光谱降维的手段主要分为波段选择和波段提取。流形学习作为一种波段提取方法,在高光谱数据降维和分类中已被广泛使用。本文提出一种改进的ISOMAP降维和改进的SAM,并用Salinas-A数据集对比SAM直接分类和PCA降维后SAM分类(PCA-SAM)。比较了分类后整体和每个类别的精确度,发现新提出的算法在整体精确度都要高于SAM和PCA-SAM,并且发现在个别类别的精确度上有很大的提高。With the development of related disciplines such as pattern recognition, machine learning, and remote sensing technology, research on the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images has achieved rapid progress. Hyperspectral images have high dimensionality and high correlation, resulting in the “curse of dimensionality”. The methods for hyperspectral dimensionality reduction are mainly divided into band selection and band extraction. Manifold learning, as a feature extraction method, has been widely used in hyperspectral data dimensionality reduction and classification. This paper proposes an improved ISOMAP dimensionality reduction and an improved SAM, and compares the direct classification of SAM with the classification of SAM after PCA dimensionality reduction (PCA-SAM) using the Salinas-A dataset. The overall accuracy and the accuracy of each category after classification are compared. It is found that the newly proposed algorithm has higher overall accuracy than both SAM and PCA-SAM, and significant improvements in accuracy are observed in individual categories.
分 类 号:TP3[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38