检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:聂正安[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南商学院经济管理研究所,湖南长沙410205
出 处:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2005年第4期453-458,共6页Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
摘 要:近些年来国内企业理论研究中形成了一个人力资本崇拜逻辑。这个逻辑合理地解释了一些现象,但是也制造了诸多理论疑点。该逻辑有如下一些理论缺陷:笼统地宣扬人力资本比物质资本重要;将人力资本的"独立"当作一个普适性话题;认为"独立的"人力资本可以获得"理想的"企业所有权;说人力资本的"独立"和"升值"就是要实现人力资本与物质资本两个所有者的合二为一;强调人力资本所有者会演变为企业所有权主要的拥有者;提倡人力资本股权化应该成为当前中国企业的普遍选择。In recent years, the logic of labor capital worship has emerged in Chinese research on the theory of the firm. This logic can explain some phenomena, however, it led many theoretical doubtful points. This paper focuses on several flaws of the logic: the generalization that labor capital is more important than physical capital; the treatment of labor capital as a common topic “independence”; the assertion that “independent” labor capital can obtain “desirable” firm ownership; the affirmation that the “independence” and “appreciation” of labor capital are just to let labor capital and physical capital under the same owner—umbrella; the emphasis that labor capital owners are to evolve toward the major owners of firm; the proposition that labor—as—stock—holder should be the normal choice for Chinese firms at the present.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28