检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张南峰[1]
机构地区:[1]岭南大学翻译系
出 处:《外国语》2005年第5期54-60,共7页Journal of Foreign Languages
摘 要:把翻译文学纳入本国文学史的呼吁,是完全合理的。但是,把译者视为翻译文学作品的唯一作者,未免简单化,而按照作者的国籍来判定作品的国籍,则有任意性。这种观点虽然新颖,却未能摆脱二元对立的传统观念。笔者认为,承认翻译文学的国籍的模糊性、双重性甚至游移性,才是出路所在。The proposal to include translated literature in the literary history of the home system is certainly justified, but it may be simplistic to regard the translator as the sole author of translated literary works, and arbitrary to classify works according to the nationality of the author. It is suggested in this paper that the way out is to give up the concept of binary opposition and to recognize the in-betweenness of translated literature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117