检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹湘军[1] 孙健[1] 何汉武[1] 陈新[1] 郑德涛[1] 张平[1]
机构地区:[1]广东工业大学机电工程学院
出 处:《系统仿真学报》2006年第4期1010-1014,共5页Journal of System Simulation
基 金:国家自然基金(50475047);广东省自然基金(05006661);湖南省教育厅科研项目(04C582);湖南省学位办研究生教研基金(04B21)
摘 要:研究了虚拟环境下基于知识融合的多Agent仿真决策中的冲突证据合成,认为传统的Dempster-Shafer证据组合规则导致悖论的主要因素是归一化因子,使结果产生了误差。对该规则进行了形式变换,分解了归一化因子,把Dempster-Shafer分为两项之合,其中第二项含有未知项。文中首次提出了融合误差的概念,引入误差函数项和全局平均支持度,这两项与未知项相关。采用等效的方法,提出了一种改进的证据组合规则,与变换后的Dempster-Shafer规则形式上一致,仅把误差赋给了未知项。理论分析和实验表明,新的合成规则得到了合理的融合结果,产生的误差最小。最后给出了一个高速贴标机的多Agent仿真决策的实例说明新组合规则的有效应用。The combination of conflicting evidences of multi-Agent decision was studied based on knowledge fusion in virtual environment. The error, unanti-resutt was caused by normalized constant in the Dempster-Shafer theory. The combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory was transformed formally that the formula was disassembled into two terms and the normalized constant was also disassembled. The second term contains an unknown. So a new improved combination rule with equivalent method was proposed and the concept of the errors of the fusion was also proposed. Then the errors of function and average of conflicting evidences were formulated, and they are correlative with the unknown term. The new approach is consistent with transformed Dempster-Shafer's rule in the form. Only the errors were assigned to the unknown term in the new approach. The experimental results and theoretical analysis show that the new methodology can produce reasonable results and its error of the fusion is minimum. Finally, an example of multi-Agent simulation decision of labeler was illustrated that the new approach is effective and reliable.
关 键 词:DEMPSTER-SHAFER理论 冲突证据组合 多AGENT决策 虚拟环境 知识融合
分 类 号:TP391.9[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49