众叛亲离的“大卫王”斯图潘家族与大卫王家族对比研究  

Contrast study on the Si Tupan famiyl and the David family

作　　者：王者会[1] 王浩勇[1] 李亚民[1] 王丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北农业大学外国语学院,河北保定071001

出　　处：《读与写（教育教学刊）》2006年第7期5-6,共2页Read and Write

摘　　要：威廉·福克纳的代表作《押沙龙,押沙龙》取材于《圣经》(撒母儿记)。本文作者认为小说人物中惟有斯图潘与大卫王对应关系明确。押沙龙在小说中则没有明确的人物对应关系,而且具有指向的模糊性和多义性。William Faulkner's representative works 'Absalom, Absalom' selects material from 'Holy Bible' (scatters mother level), this article author thought only Si Tupan and David's correspond relations of the novel characters are clear. Absalom does not have explicit correspond relations in the elementary school, but has directional fuzziness and

关 键 词：大卫王 斯图潘 押沙龙 多义性 

分 类 号：I074[文学—文学理论]