检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏静[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学教育学院公民与道德教育研究中心,北京100875
出 处:《比较教育研究》2007年第4期29-33,共5页International and Comparative Education
摘 要:儒家的仁爱教育和诺丁斯的关怀教育在精神实质和教育理念上有很多相通之处,如都把情感作为道德的基础,重视情感教育;均视家庭教育为教育的起点。但两者也存在很多不同之处,如仁爱作为个体美德与关怀作为关系美德之不同;重责任教育与重权利教育之不同;培养男性为主的君子与培养两性平等的关怀者之不同。仁爱教育与关怀教育之比较,不仅有利于解释仁爱教育的现代化内涵,而且也能充实关怀教育思想。There are many resemblances in spiritual essence and ideal of education between Jen-Love Education and Caring Education. Both of them are based on human relatedness being and emphasize constructing good teacher-student relation; both stress the importance of emotion in the moral education; both start with family education. However, many difference such as individual virtue and relational virtue, stressing duty education and power education, cultivating different aims of male junzi and dual-gender carer. By comparison, not only can we understand the value of Jen-Love education better in our time, but the theory of caring education can be enriched and strengthened.
分 类 号:G40[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145