检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翁梁[1,2] 温鲁[2] 杨芳[3] 汪敬健[2]
机构地区:[1]新疆农业大学食品科学学院,乌鲁木齐830052 [2]淮阴师范学院资源微生物研究所,淮安223300 [3]南京师范大学生命科学学院,南京210079
出 处:《食品科技》2008年第11期180-182,共3页Food Science and Technology
基 金:江苏省高校自然科学基金(05KJB180010);淮阴师范学院教授基金(06HSJS027)。
摘 要:目的:明确沸水浴、超声波和微波提取方法对蛹虫草多糖提取得率和抗氧化性的影响。方法:用3种不同方法提取蛹虫草多糖,经醇沉、脱色、脱蛋白制成精多糖,用苯酚-硫酸法测定多糖含量,用清除羟基自由基能力测定抗氧化性,并对测定结果进行比较。结果:当多糖浓度为1.0mg/mL时,沸水浴和微波提取多糖的抗氧化性分别为95.36%和97.11%,超声波较差,为74.46%。结论:利用微波提取的蛹虫草多糖具有很好的抗氧化性,而且提取时间短,提取得率较高。Objective: To clear the Cordyceps polysaccharide extraction yield and the impact of antioxidation with the three methods, boiling water bath, microwave and ultrasonic extraction methods. Methods: With three different methods, we extract the polysaccharide, extracted by alcohol precipitation, decolorizing, removed protein to make the fine polysaccharide, phenol-sulphate acid to get the polysaccharide content, judged by the ability of removing the hydroxyl radical to measure the antioxidation, then compared with the two results. Results: When the concentration of polysaccharide is 1.0 mg/mL, the impact of polysaccharide antioxidation with boiling water bath and microwave extraction were 95.36% and 97.11%, the result of ultrasonic extraction is worst, just 74.46 percent. Conclusion: The polysaccharide extracted by microwave has the better antioxidation, and the process we would be with a shorter time, and have a higher rate.
分 类 号:TS201[轻工技术与工程—食品科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185