h指数在研究人员评价中的应用——以中国大陆地区教育技术学领域研究人员科研绩效评价为例  

The Application of h-index in Researchers Evaluation:——A Case Study of the Research Performance Evaluation of Researchers of Educational Technology Field in China's Mainland

作　　者：梁振辉[1] 魏顺平[2] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语艺术职业学院,广东广州510640 [2]北京师范大学现代教育技术研究所,北京100875

出　　处：《现代教育技术》2009年第1期21-27,共7页Modern Educational Technology

摘　　要：文章运用Hirsch指数(简称h指数)方法以及与之相近的w指数方法,通过对中国知网(CNKI)中国引文数据库收录的教育技术学领域的CSSCI来源期刊在1998年至2007年所刊发论文的被引用数据进行统计分析,对1998年至2007年10年间中国大陆地区教育技术学领域研究人员的科研绩效进行了评价,评选得到了"1998至2007年段中国大陆地区教育技术学领域最具科研绩效的前30位研究人员",并对h指数与其他评价指标进行了相关性分析。分析结果表明,利用h指数来评价研究人员的科研绩效,一定程度上可以反映"总被引频次"、"论文数量"、"篇均被引频次"三项指标的评价结果,h指数可以说是一项更为综合的评价指标。In this paper, the authors applied h-index method and w-index method which is similar with h-index in evaluating the research performance of researchers in Educational Technology field of China's Mainland during the period of 1998 to 2007, by analyzing the citation data of papers published by 6 academic magazines（ the 6 academic magazine are also the source magazines of CSSCI） in Educational Technology field and brought forward a scholars list which is the 30 most influenceable scholars in Educational Technology field of China's Mainland during the period of 1998 to 2007. And the authors made the correlation analysis between h-index and other indexes. The correlation analysis result showed that applying h-index in evaluating the research performance of researchers can replace the evaluation result by other indexes such as total citation number, paper number and citation number per paper in a certain degree. In other words, h-index is a more comprehensive evaluating index.

关 键 词：H指数 教育技术学 研究人员 科研绩效评价 

分 类 号：G40-051[文化科学—教育学原理]