检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南农业大学食品科学技术学院,郑州450002
出 处:《果树学报》2010年第2期299-302,共4页Journal of Fruit Science
基 金:河南农业大学食品科学技术学院资助项目(20080203);河南省教育厅科技攻关项目部分内容(2007550010)
摘 要:研究了预处理方式、微波渗糖和干燥工艺等不同加工工艺对低糖果脯维生素C保存的影响,通过追踪测定各个工艺环节中维生素C保存的变化来寻求最佳微波渗糖工艺条件。结果表明,3种预处理方式在维生素C含量保存上以食盐预处理最好,微波预处理次之,热水漂烫预处理最差,质量分数2%的食盐溶液中浸泡30 min时果坯维生素C含量为1.083 0 mg.g-1,效果较好;微波渗糖时采用30%的微波火力渗糖20 min,后期干燥时选用60℃干燥6 h,与其他处理差异显著,果脯口感纯正,可以使多维营养得到最大程度的保存。The pretreatment methods,sugar osmosis by microwave and the drying processes were used to investigate the ef-fects of different processing technology on preservation of vitamin C in low sugar preserved fruit and the best formulation was selected out through tracking down the vitamin C content in different processing technology.Result indicated: among the three pretreatments,salt pretreatment was the best one for preservation of vitamin C,followed by microwave pretreatment and the hot water pretreatment was the worst.Soaking for 30 min in 2%(w/w) salt solution the vitamin C content was 1.083 0 mg.kg-1,showing a good effectiveness.When doing sugar osmosis under 30% firepower by microwave for 20 min and later drying for 6 h at temperature of 60 ℃ had a significant difference compared with other treatments.The methods could make the mul-ti-dimensional nutrition to be kept in the preserves.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28