检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京交通大学机械与电子控制工程学院,北京100044 [2]石家庄铁道大学,石家庄050043 [3]北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院,北京100044
出 处:《振动与冲击》2010年第9期51-54,96,共5页Journal of Vibration and Shock
基 金:国家杰出青年科学基金(50625518);国家自然科学基金(10902074);北京交通大学优秀博士生创新基金(141088522);上海交通大学开放基金(MSV-2009-03)
摘 要:提出一种基于加速度阻尼原理的改进型半主动控制,可以克服天棚阻尼半主动控制在高频范围内抑制振动效果差的缺点。突破了以往研究半主动控制只针对单车车辆的限制,利用ADAMS(Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Me-chanical Systems)建立了2动2拖104个自由度动车组模型,并结合Matlab/Simulink对提出的半主动控制方法进行设计和联合仿真。根据联合仿真的结果,从时域和频域两个角度对比两种半主动控制方法对车辆运行平稳性和安全性的影响,并分析控制中时滞对系统性能的影响。结果发现,改进型半主动控制在提高车辆运行平稳性和抗时滞方面效果更佳。The bad effect on vibration reduction usually appears when adopting a traditional skyhook semi-active control in high-frequency domain.In order to overcome the disadvantage,an improved semi-active control strategy based on acceleration damping was proposed.A high speed EMUs(Electric Multiple Units)model containing two motor cars and two traction cars with 104 DOFs was built by using conventional software ADAMS(Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems),which breaks through the traditional methods' limitation of single car based model.The proposed semi-active control methods were designed and co-simulated by combined use of ADAMS and Simulink.According to the co-simulation results,the effects of two semi-active control methods on riding quality and safety were compared in both time domain and frequency domain,and the influences of time-delay on system performances were analyzed.The results show that the performances of improved semi-active control are better in riding quality and vibration reduction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222