逻辑·境界·知识--试论冯友兰与金岳霖哲学思想的异同  

Logic· Realm· Knowledge——On the Similarities and Differences between the Philosophies of Feng Youlan and Jin Yuelin

作　　者：杨生照[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学哲学系上海200241

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2011年第3期32-35,共4页Qilu Journal

基　　金：华东师范大学研究生院“2011年优势重点学科/新兴交叉学科博士研究生科研创新项目”资助

摘　　要：作为20世纪最重要的中国哲学家,冯友兰、金岳霖二先生的哲学研究都从逻辑分析与重建形上学始,并建构了非常类似的形上学本体论,即《新理学》与《论道》;最后却一个以神秘主义的人生境界终,一个以理性主义的知识论终。无论是冯友兰的新理学与他的人生境界说之间,还是金岳霖的元学本体论与他的知识论之间,都存在着某种根本的断裂,亦即科学与人文或理性与情感(非理性)之间的断裂。As the most important Chinese philosophers in 20th century, both Feng Youlan and Jin Yuelin began their investigation of philosophy with logical analysis and metaphysics reconstruction, and constructed very similar metaphysical ontology, that is New - Rationalism and On Tao. However, Feng ended in the mystic human realm, and Jin ended with rational theory of knowledge. There is an essential rupture between Feng＇ s Neo-Rationalism and his theory of human realm, and ＇also between Jin＇ s ontology and his theory of knowledge, which is the rupture between science and humanity or reason and emotion.

关 键 词：冯友兰 金岳霖 逻辑分析 形而上学 人生境界说 知识论 

分 类 号：B261[哲学宗教—中国哲学]