连贯性对文本表征意识性的影响  

The Influence of Coherence on the Consciousness of Text Representation

作　　者：王瑞明[1] 吴迪[1] 邹艳荣[1,2] 周爱斯[1] 曾祥炎[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州510631 [2]广州科技贸易职业学院心理健康教育中心,广州511442

出　　处：《心理学报》2011年第10期1114-1123,共10页Acta Psychologica Sinica

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(08JCXLX005);国家自然科学基金项目(30900409);"国家基础科学人才培养基金‘华南师范大学心理学基地’(J1030729)";广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室项目资助

摘　　要：采用独立记得-知道范式(IRK)和加工分离范式(PDP)探讨了整体连贯和局部连贯条件下连贯性高低对文本表征意识性的影响。实验1使用独立记得-知道范式(IRK),通过分析被试对再认项目判断为"记得"或"知道"的比例(击中率),探讨连贯性对文本表征意识性的影响。实验2使用加工分离范式(PDP),通过分析被试在包含、排斥测验中的击中率和虚报率,探讨连贯性对文本表征意识性的影响。总的实验结果表明,在整体连贯条件下,连贯性只影响有意识加工,不影响无意识加工;而局部连贯条件下,连贯性对有意识加工和无意识加工都有影响,证明了不同连贯条件下连贯性高低对文本表征的加工过程有着不同的影响。Long et al. （2006） found that the construction of situation model was conscious while the construction of textbase was unconscious through two paradigms （IRK and PDP）in text reading. With a careful examination to the experiment materials, it is found that the materials at two levels of coherence （low and high） are all globally coherent. Previous research on text-reading established a wide acknowledgement that the local coherence condition connects with the construction of textbase while the global coherence condition connects with the construction of situation model. However, the evidence given by Long is insufficient to prove the fact that the construction of textbase is unconscious because the conclusion is purely based on materials that are globally coherent. In this study, two experiments were designed to explore the influence of different coherence levels on the consciousness of text representation with the two paradigms （IRK and PDP）. A self-paced, line-by-line reading paradigm was used in this study. In experiment 1, 30 university students were asked to read 16 narrative passages. One independent variable is the relationship between the elaboration on a characteristic of the protagonist and the subsequent target action carried out by the protagonist. The independent variable had two levels： high coherence and low coherence. The other independent variable is the coherence in the passage, which also had two levels： global coherence and local coherence. The dependent variable was the rate of ＂remember＂ or ＂know＂ judgment. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the four material sets and asked to read the texts, followed by a recognition test. They were instructed to press the key labeled new if they believed the sentence did not appear in one of the texts they had read. Otherwise, press the key labeled old, then they were asked to decide whether they had a vivid and clear consciousness of the sentence; if so, they were asked to press the key labeled R （for remember）. If

关 键 词：文本阅读 连贯性 有意识加工 无意识加工 

分 类 号：B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]