检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学管理学院,北京100875 [2]清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084
出 处:《经济管理》2012年第10期107-115,共9页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目"大学生毕业前后生涯适应的Agent模拟;追踪和干预研究"(71171020);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"经济衰退背景下多层次的企业员工可就业性的追踪研究"(09YJC630012);全国教育科学"十一五"规划项目"大学生可就业性的结构;发展;对求职行为的影响及干预策略"(EIA080280)
摘 要:为了对我国企业领导者领导组织学习提供指导,本文对人力资源管理实践在中国文化特色的家长式领导与组织学习关系中的中介机制进行了研究。通过问卷调查法在13家企业调研,获得461份有效问卷。在建构人力资源管理实践问卷的基础上,结构方程模型分析的结果显示,仁慈领导通过战略性培训、薪酬管理、员工参与决策三个具体人力资源管理实践的完全中介作用推动组织学习;德行领导通过战略性培训、薪酬管理的部分中介作用推动组织学习;威权领导则通过战略性培训、薪酬管理的完全中介作用推动组织学习。研究表明,我国企业的家长式领导可以通过建立和完善组织的人力资源管理实践来推动组织学习或创建学习型组织。For Chinese enterprises ,the organizational learning capacity is the most important core competitive inthe future. But Chinese leaders don' t know how to lead organizational learning. To date, there was limited systematic empirical research directly linking leadership and organizational learning. Recent theoretical work systematically linked transformational and transactional leadership with organizational learning. Only few empirical study explored the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational learning, and the results showed that transforma- tional leadership could improve organizational leaning. The paternalistic leadership is based on the Chinese culture. However, there was no research to explore the effectiveness mechanism of the paternalistic leadership on or- ganizational learning in the context of Chinese culture. And the management practice in China need to know what and how leadershio could improve organizational leaning in order to improve their organizational core competitiveness One survey that contained organizational learning scale, paternalistic leadership scale, and human resource management practice scale was employed as the tool in the study. Among the major measures,the 33-item 3of pater- nalistic leadership scale was adopted from Zheng et al (2011) ;29-item organizational learning scale was measured by using the questionnaire of Yu Haibo et al( 1991 ) ;19-item human resource management practice scale was devel- oped by L6pez et al (1994) and Wright et al (2005). The reliability of Cronbach' s alpha for these measures were all above 0. 70. Four hundred and sixty one employees of thirteen enterprises from several cities in China answered the questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) and structure equation model (SEM) were applied to the analysis of the data. The results of EFA showed that Human Resource Management Practice Questionnaire was composed of five fac- tors : selection and employment
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.17.22