检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京100875 [2]北京市第十三中学,北京100009 [3]香港浸会大学社会科学学院
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2012年第6期625-633,共9页Psychological Development and Education
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目资助(05JJDXLX001)
摘 要:采用青少年父母教养方式问卷、青少年小五人格问卷和青少年社会适应评估问卷对六城市的2288名中学生进行调查,探讨父母教养方式对青少年社会适应的影响及人格类型在其中的调节作用。结果发现:(1)青少年父母教养方式可分为民主型、权威型、专制型和忽视型四种,所占比例分别为35.2%、16.9%、20.8%、27.1%,不同父母教养类型的青少年在社会适应、人格五因素各维度上的差异达到显著水平;(2)除撤回爱护与行事效率之间相关不显著外,父母教养行为与青少年社会适应各维度相关均达到显著水平;(3)人格类型可以调节父母教养行为对青少年社会适应的预测作用,表现在支持陪伴、自主准予及知晓度对积极适应的影响以及规则引导、自主准予及知晓度对消极适应的影响。To explore the influence of Parenting on Social Adjustment of adolescents, and the moderation effects of personality, Parenting Styles Questionnaires, Five-factor Personality Questionnaires and Adolescents' Social Adjustment Assessment Questionnaires were administered to the sample consisting of 2288 students from six cities in China, in order to identify personality as a moderator. The results showed that: (1) parenting behaviors could be divided into 4 different parenting styles, namely democratic style, authoritative style, authoritarian style and neglectful style, the proportions of which were 35.2% , 16.9% , 20.8% , and 27. 1% respectively. Significant differences in social adjustment and personality existed among adolescents with different parenting styles. (2) Parenting and adolescents' social adjustment were significantly related, except the correlation between withdrawal of care and acting efficiency. (3) Personality served as a moderator in the relationship between support and company, autonomy, monitor and positive adjustment, and the relationship between guide, autonomy, monitor and negative adjustment.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.27