检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苟顺明[1]
机构地区:[1]云南师范大学职业技术教育学院,云南昆明650092
出 处:《职业技术教育》2012年第25期29-33,共5页Vocational and Technical Education
基 金:云南省教育科学"十一五"规划2009年度课题<高等职业教育"专接本"衔接机制研究>(GY090129);主持人:苟顺明
摘 要:对国内14个省市高等职业教育"专升本"考试方案的分析发现,我国高等职业教育"专升本"考试存在着招生主体错位、考试内容偏颇、考试形式单一、升本考试与专科教育脱节等问题。同时,我国高职专升本也积累了一些有益经验,如学校自主招生、建立推荐学校和招生学校的合作关系、重视对专业知识和技能的要求、合理实施"中期选拔"等。未来发展中,我国高职专升本考试应赋予职教特色突出的本科院校招生权,拓宽高职生的升本通道,抓好本专科学校课程衔接。Analyzing on entrance examination plans of 14 provinces in China shows that, the entrance examination from higher vocational education to undergraduate education is problematic, for example, it is the province decides the exam, not the university; the content of the exam is not relevant to what the students learn in higher vocational education, and also, the exam is paper-pencil test, and their is no way to know the students' vocational skills. However, some provinces also have beneficial experiences on the entrance exam, such as empowering the undergraduate university, building partner- ship between high vocational education and the university, paying attention to students' vocational skills, and carrying out mid-term selection. In future development, the entrance examination from higher vocational education to undergraduate edu- cation should empower more rights to the colleges, try to expand the approaches of higher vocational students going study, and doing well in the linkage of curriculum of the two.
关 键 词:高等职业教育 “专升本”考试 教育衔接 本科院校
分 类 号:G718.5[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.207.109