检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆师范大学物理与电子工程学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《喀什师范学院学报》2012年第6期69-72,共4页Journal of Kashgar Teachers College
摘 要:随着新课程标准的出台,学业成就评价和课程标准的一致性分析成为教育改革的热门话题.借鉴美国SEC一致性分析方法对2011年新疆中考物理试卷与全日制义务教育物理课程标准间的一致性进行了研究.研究结果表明,物理课程内容标准和中考物理试卷的一致性程度不高,主要表现为两者在内容主题和认知水平上的侧重点不同.With the Appearing of the new curriculum standard, the analysis of alignment between the scholastic achievement evaluating and the curriculum standard become heated discussion among the educational reform. This paper based on the U.S, SEC alignment analysis method mainly takes a survey to the analysis between the Entrance Examination to the Senior High School (ESHS) 201 lphysics examination paper and the fidl4ime compulsory, edu- cation physics course standard in Xinjiang. It can be concluded from this paper that there is a slight common point between the physics course standard and the physical examination paper tests, and the differences of the emphasis point are mainly shown on the content of subjects and level of cognitive.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175