检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李莉[1,2] 李银芳[3] 刘航[1,2] 邓力[1,2] 吴恩珍[1,2]
机构地区:[1]川北医学院护理学院,四川南充637000 [2]川北医学院附属医院风湿科,四川南充637000 [3]秦皇岛港口医院呼吸内科,河北秦皇岛066000
出 处:《护理学报》2013年第3期8-10,共3页Journal of Nursing(China)
摘 要:目的评价思维导图在《基础护理学》实验课集体备课中的应用效果。方法将思维导图运用到护理本科《基础护理学》实验课集体备课中,采用自行设计的调查问卷收集教师对该备课法的效果评价。采用护理实验教学质量评价表,收集学生对实验课教学质量的评分。学生评价采用历史对照,本研究的授课对象为2010级护生(采用思维导图集体备课法),将其评分与2009级护生(采用传统集体备课法)进行比较。结果教师对思维导图集体备课法评价较高,2010级护生对实验课教学质量的评分(92.89±4.73)分高于2009级护生的评分(91.02±4.28)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论将思维导图运用到《基础护理学》实验课集体备课中,能够集思广益,促进思考,便于记录,有助于实现备课目标,提高教学质量。Objective To evaluate the effects of mind map in collective preparations for laboratory course of Fundamental Nursing. Methods Mind Map was applied in the collective preparations for laboratory course of Fundamental Nursing. A self-designed questionnaire was used for teachers' evaluation of the approach and a teaching quality evaluation sheet about nursing laboratory for the evaluation of the course from students in grade 2010 and 2009. Results The teachers were in favor of mind map and the scores from students in grade 2010 for evaluating the quality of laboratory teaching was 92.89±4.73, which was higher than that from students in grade 2009 (91.02±4.28). The difference showed statistical significance (P〈0.01). Conclusion Mind map in the collective preparations for laboratory course of Fundamental Nursing is beneficial to improving the quality of teaching.
分 类 号:G424.1[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229