名著阅读与同伴互评  

Reading Classical Literary Works and Peer Review

作　　者：陈茂庆[1] 李宏鸿[1] 高惠蓉[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学

出　　处：《外语教学理论与实践》2013年第1期71-78,共8页Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice

摘　　要：本研究在某高校英语专业二年级泛读课程的名著阅读活动中引入同伴互评方法,结果发现:同伴在语言形式方面的批阅多于内容方面的批阅;同伴互评的正确率较高,而且有逐渐提高的趋势;同伴互评在一定程度上提高了学生阅读和撰写文章的认真程度;与教师评阅相比,同伴评阅没有明显的劣势。学生通过互评深化了对名著的理解,拓宽了思路;相互启发和督促,提高了写作水平,增进了彼此的了解,而且为未来的职业训练作了一定的铺垫。In this research, the subjects, a class of second-year English majors conducted peer review in criticizing classical literary works in the course of extensive reading. Through questionnaire, and by comparing and analyzing the subjects＇ first drafts and final drafts, this research revealed that the peer review in surface form was more than that in content, and that peer review showed a high correctness ratio and stimulated the subjects to make more efforts in their reading and writing. Compared with teacher review, peer review showed merely a slightly lower acceptance among the subjects. Through peer review, the subjects achieved a better understanding of classical literary works, improved their writing, enhanced mutual understanding and did some preparation for career training as prospective teachers.

关 键 词：名著 同伴互评 教师评阅 泛读 

分 类 号：H319[语言文字—英语]