检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘丽娟[1,2,3,4] 庞勇[2] 范文义[4] 李增元[2] 张登荣[1,3] 李明泽[4]
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学遥感与地球科学研究院,浙江杭州311121 [2]中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所,北京100091 [3]浙江省城市湿地与区域变化研究重点实验室,浙江杭州311121 [4]东北林业大学林学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040
出 处:《遥感学报》2013年第3期679-695,共17页NATIONAL REMOTE SENSING BULLETIN
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(编号:2007CB714404);国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(编号:2012AA12A306);国家自然科学基金(编号:41071272);国家林业局行业公益课题(编号:200704019)~~
摘 要:将机载LiDAR(Light Detection and Ranging)与高光谱CASI(Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager)数据融合,充分利用垂直结构信息和光谱信息进行温带森林树种分类,并与仅用高光谱数据的分类结果相比较,评估融合数据的树种分类能力。结合样地实测数据,首先用LiDAR获得的3维垂直结构信息对CASI影像上的林间空隙进行掩膜,提取林木冠层子集;然后对冠层子集分层掩膜,利用光谱曲线的一阶微分及曲线匹配技术,实现各树种训练样本的自动提取;利用SVM分类器对两种数据分类并比较精度。结果表明,融合数据的树种分类总体精度和Kappa系数(83.88%,0.80)优于仅使用CASI数据(76.71%、0.71),优势树种的制图精度为78.43%—89.22%,用户精度为75.15%—95.65%,整体也优于仅使用CASI的制图精度(68.51%—84.69%)和用户精度(63.34%—95.45%)。结果表明,机载LiDAR与CASI基于像元的融合对温带森林树种识别的精度较仅高光谱数据有较大提高。This paper presents a method for the fusion of the airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Canopy Height Model (CHM) and the hyperspectral Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI) data (CASI+CHM) to take advantage of vertical smictural and spectral information as well as to evaluate the classification capacity of fusion data. Tree species in a natural temperate forest were successfully identified and compared with CASI data. Based on the vertical information obtained by using LiDAR, forest gap pixels were masked, whereas canopy pixels were acquired. In addition to the mean heights of tree species, la-ain- ing samples were extracted using the first derivative of a spectral curve with curve matching technology. Classification accuracies were compared between the fused data and data without CHM. The results show that the total accuracy and kappa coefficient (83.88%, 0.80) of CASI+CHM is better than those of CASI data alone (76.71%, 0.71), with the mapping accuracy and user accuracy of dominant species reaching a range of 78.43%-89 22% and 75.15%-95.65%, respectively. These results are also better than those obtained through CASI data alone (68.51%-84.69% and 63.34%-95.45% ). The proposed method for tree species identification in a natural temperate forest is feasible with fused LiDAR and layperspectral data.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63