检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐海红[1] 王永平[1] 边亚滨[1] 杨华珠[1]
机构地区:[1]南京军区福州总医院476临床部护理部,350002
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2013年第15期1820-1822,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:南京军区福州总医院476临床部院长基金课题(YZJJ2010M01)
摘 要:目的探讨提高新护士急救处置能力的培训方法。方法将2010年度招聘的40名新护士设为对照组,采用传统的急救技能单项考核培训模式,2011年招聘的56名新护士设为研究组,实行急救技能单项考核与专科急救情景剧竞赛相结合的培训模式,对两组培训效果进行比较。结果新护士独立上岗时间对照组为(12.00±0.43)周,研究组缩短至(11.00±0.87)周,差异有统计学意义(t=6.70,P〈0.01)。医务人员对新护士工作满意度对照组为88.34%,研究组为96.60%,差异有统计学意义(Х^2=137.33,P〈0.01)。结论急救技能单项考核与专科急救情景剧竞赛相结合的培训模式,可提高新护士急救处置能力,是一种有效的培训方法。Objective To explore the methods of improving emergency treatment skills of new nurses. Methods Totals of 40 new nurses adopted individual assessment of traditional aid skills in 2010 as control group, and 56 new nurses in 2011 adopted the training model of individual assessment of traditional aid skills combined with specialist first aid melodrama competition as experimental group. The effect was compared between the two groups. Results Independent induction time of new nurses was ( 12.00 ± 0.43 ) weeks in the control group, and ( 11.00 ± 0. 87 ) weeks in the experimental group, and the difference was statistically significant(t = 6. 70,P 〈0.01 ). The satisfaction of the medical staff to new nurses was 88.34% in the control group, and 96.60% in the experimental group, and the difference was statistically significant( Х^2 = 137.33 ,P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions The training model of individual assessment of traditional aid skills combined with specialist first aid melodrama competition is effective way to improve emergency treatment skills of new nurses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7