检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市中山医院心内科,400013
出 处:《中华医学教育杂志》2013年第5期715-716,共2页Chinese Journal of Medical Education
摘 要:目的 探讨以问题为基础学习教学法在心脏内科学临床教学中的应用效果.方法 选取在重庆市中山医院心脏内科进行临床实习的重庆医科大学2007级儿科学专业2个班学生为研究对象,其中一个班48人为为实验组,另一个班47人为对照组,实验组采用以问题为基础学习教学法,对照组采用传统教学法.分析比较2班学生实习结束后的考试成绩和问卷调查结果,探讨2种教学方法的效果.结果 实验组学生的考试成绩优于对照组(x2=7.407,P=0.025),实验组学生较对照组学生对学习表现出更大的兴趣,更积极、更自信(U<0.001,P=0.009).结论 以问题为基础学习教学方法在心脏内科学临床教学中能够取得较好的教学效果.Objective To evaluate the effects of problem-based learning(PBL) in cardiovascular medicine.Methods We choosed two classes of the 2007 grade paediatric department practicing in Cardiovascular medicine.The one calss was trial group(n =48),the other was control group(n =47).PBL method was used in trial group,lecture-based learning(LBL) was used in control group.The examination scores of students in two classes and the questionnaire survey results were compared,the effect of two kinds of teaching methods was discussed.Results The distribution of scores of students in trial group prior to that of control group(x2 =7.407,P =0.025),The trial group students showed greater interest in learning,more active and more confident than the control group students (U < 0.001,P =0.009).Conclusions PBL teaching method can obtain better effects than LBL in clinical teaching of cardiovascular medicine.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] R-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117