新课程高考化学试题命制与课程标准一致性研究  

Research on the Consistency Relationship between the Chemistry New Curriculum of College Entrance Examination and Curriculum Standard the Testing System

作　　者：王后雄[1] 孙建明[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学化学教育研究所

出　　处：《中国考试》2013年第11期10-21,共12页journal of China Examinations

基　　金：教育部华中师范大学国家教育创新平台理论创新研究项目(项目批准号:985ZB0406)的研究成果之一;湖北省教育科学"十二五"规划重点课题"中小学教师教学诊断能力发展机制研究"(课题编号:2012A005)阶段性成果;华中师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育计划资助~~

摘　　要：SEC作为一种"一致性"定量分析的方法,具有诸多优点,美国联邦政府和十几个地方州市都采用这种方法进行考试命题与课程标准一致性的评价研究。通过采用SEC定量分析的方法,从内容要素、认知层次两个维度2010年、2011年和2012年(新课标)全国高考理综卷的化学试题与课程标准,发现它们之间不存在统计学范畴内的显著一致性。内容要素分布上,三个年份的试题与课程标准存在着明显的差异;认知层次分布上,三个年份的化学试题与课程标准的要求基本一致。The SEC as a kind of ＂consistency＂ quantitative analysis method, has many advantages, thefederal government and city ten several places are using this method to test proposition and curriculum standard consistency evaluation research. By adopting the SEC quantitative analysis method, research from two aspects of content elements, the cognitive level （new standard） 2010, 2011 and 2012 the national college entrance examination principle of chemical test and curriculum standards, between them there is no statistically significant consistency of a category. Content elements distribution, three years of test and curriculum standard there are significant differences; Cognitive level distribution, three years of chemical test and curriculum standards are basically identical.

关 键 词：高考化学试题 课程标准 一致性研究 

分 类 号：G405[文化科学—教育学原理]