魏源对西汉四家诗的评说  

Wei Yuans Evaluation of the Four Schools of Poetry in Western Han

作　　者：黄开国[1] 李知恕[2] 唐晓勇[3] 

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学孔子研究所,山东曲阜273163 [2]四川大学哲学系,四川成都610064 [3]西南财经大学马克思主义学院,四川成都610054

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第2期39-48,共10页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基　　金：2013年国家社科基金项目"清代今文经学新论"(13BZX046)

摘　　要：对西汉四家诗的评说,代有异义。魏源在《诗古微》中,提出了以时间早晚、得《诗》的本义还是旁义来评价其得失的观念。他认为,三家诗早于《毛诗》,得作者的本义,而《毛诗》晚于三家诗,得《诗》之旁义,本义高于旁义,故三家诗高于《毛诗》。此说具有还原《诗》的文学本色及重情、崇情的时代价值。但是,魏源之说充满经学与文学、重本义还是重旁义的矛盾,所以,他又提出齐、鲁、韩、毛同轨合辙的说法。Scholars of different times have voiced different opinions of the four schools of Poetry in Western Han. Wei Quan, in his Interpreting Ancient Poetry （gushi wei）, proposed to evaluate the four schools on the basis of the time of their emergence and whether they grasp the original meaning or the extended meaning. He believed that the Qi, Lu and Han poetry, earlier than the Mao school, get the original meaning of the Poetry, and so they are better than the Mao poetry, which appeared later and got only the extended meaning. His idea helps re-emphasize the Poetry as a literary work of expressing strong human emotions. However, Wei Yuan＇s evaluation did not resolve many contradictions, and he had to conclude that all four schools share the same track and led to the same destination.

关 键 词：魏源 评说 四家诗 

分 类 号：B252[哲学宗教—中国哲学]