检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张景焕[1] 李建全[1] 郑雪梅 张舜[1] 刘桂荣[1]
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学心理学院,济南250014 [2]邹城市大束镇政府,济宁273511
出 处:《心理与行为研究》2014年第2期145-150,共6页Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(12YJA190024);教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(11JZD040);山东省重点强化建设重点学科心理发展与教育的资助
摘 要:采用父母教养方式评价量表、田纳西自我概念量表和托兰斯创造性思维测验(中文版),测量了429名初中生的父母教养方式、自我概念与创造思维,并对其关系进行考察。结果发现:(1)父亲温暖、理解显著正向预测初中生的创造思维,父亲惩罚、严厉显著负向预测初中生的创造思维,母亲教养方式与之呈现出相似的预测模式;(2)自我概念在父亲惩罚、严厉与独创性间起中介作用;(3)在自我概念的三个维度中,只有自我认同在父母温暖、理解/父母惩罚、严厉与创造思维间起中介作用。作者着重探讨了父母惩罚、严厉,自我概念与创造思维的关系以及对父母教养子女的启示。This study aimed to explore the relationship between parenting styles, self-concept and creative thinking. 429 junior middle school students completed the short form of Parenting Style Scale (EMBU), Tennessee Self-concept Scale (TSCS) and Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TI'CT). The results showed that : 1 ) paternal emotional warmth positively predicted creative performance, whereas paternal severe punishment negatively predicted creative performance, and similar relation was found for maternal parenting style; 2) general self-concept completely media- ted paternal severe punishment and originality; 3 ) self-identity mediated the relationship between parental emotion- al warmth/parental severe punishment and creative thinking. The relationship between self-concept, parental severe punishment and creativity as well as the implications of these finding were discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118